7 day real time Comparison of Medtronic vs Dexcom
, Posted by Brian Tubbs on another Forum. Copied with his permission.
|
|
|
The following is a comparison of the Medtronic CGMS and the Dexcom 7 CGMS.
These results are only for 7 days, and only performed on one person. It is likely that the CGMS's could perform differently for different people. Therefore, the following information is not intended to say which devise is better than the other, but to merely share our experiences.
My daughter Kendall (age 6) wore both the Medtronic CGMS and the Dexcom 7 CGMS from August 1, 2008 – August 7, 2008. Both units were inserted into her backside and she wore both units at the same time for the full 7 days. During this time we attempted to test often and record the reading off of both CGMSs and her Onetouch meter. We also attempted to record which CGMS alarmed first for highs and lows. Due to various activities and Kendall being 6, we did not catch all alarms, or test BG at all instances.
ACCURACY With 67 reading over the 7 day period (where we have readings for Dexcom, Medtronic and Onetouch), the Dexcom was approximately 21% more accurate (10 points). For determining accuracy, I took standard deviation of the variances of the CGMSs from the Onetouch meter.
Dexcom: std=36.7 Medtronic: std=46.5
READING TOO LOW Both CGMS were over 100 points low two times during the test. One of the two times, they were both off by more than 100 points at the same time.
The Dexcom had 13 instances where the CGMS was 50 points or more lower than the Onetouch meter.
The Medtronic had 14 instances where the CGMS was 50 points or more lower than the Onetouch meter.
READING TOO HIGH The Dexcom had 5 instances where the CGMS was 30 points or more higher than the Onetouch meter.
The Medtronic had 11 instances where the CGMS was 30 points or more higher than the Onetouch meter.
HIGH ALARMS We had a number of alarms through the test period; however, we did not always record Kendall's BG with the Onetouch, therefore we could not tell if the alarm was true or false. The following is some of the high alarms that we received that had a BG recorded.
In two instances Dexcom was the only alarm to give us a high alarm. One time both CGMSs gave a high alarm at the same time. Three times Dexcom alarmed first and then Medtronic alarmed later. The advanced times were 15 minutes (once); 30 minutes (once); and 45 minutes (once).
In no instances did the Medtronic give a high alarm first. This is given the caveats mentioned above.
LOW ALARMS Four times the Dex was the only CGMS to give an alarm (this could have been because we treated and BG rose prior to Medtronic giving an alarm). One time Medtronic was the only CGMS to give an alarm. One time Medtronic alarmed first by 10 minutes. Four times Dexcom alarmed first (5, 15, 20, 30).
USEABILITY From a user stand point, the Medtronic (in my opinion) is far superior. The Dexcom falls short in that: - Can not see actual historical numbers without computer. (if you are looking at the dots, and you see that your last dot is lower than the previous dot, you do not know if it is 5 pints lower {60 points an hour trend} or 20 pints lower {240 points an hour trend}) - Can not see when that last alarm occurred. - Can not see when the next calibration is needed. This could then sneak up on you and required a 2 am update. - Can not see the sensor age. - More difficult to enter Meter BG - Rechargeable battery. This is good in that you will save battery costs; however, if it goes low while out, you can not just replace. - Lack of transmitter memory. The Medtronic transmitter can store up to 20 minutes of readings, so if you get separated from the receiver, you will be able to the past 20 minute readings. This is good for swimming, or forgetfulness.
After posting those results, Brian was asked a question and he provided this additional comment:
We currently own the Medtronic. The Dexcom was on loan to us.
The lack of user functionality on the Dexcom is a big negative. However, the Dexcom did seem to leave less trauma on the body when removed.
If you never had a CGMS, then you would not miss the functionality provided by the medtronic. Thus the Dexcom might be preferable due to greater accuracy on Kendall.
I hope that Animas (the pump we currently use), builds in the user functionality when it is incorporated into their pump in mid-2009.
|
Last update: Aug 21 2008, 05:10 PM by Linda B Created: Aug 21 2008, 05:10 PM by Linda B
Views: 592
|
|
|
|
 Sidebar
Navigation
Stats
Our members have created a total of 5 articles in 4 categories.
A total of 15 edits have been made and our articles have been viewed 1,736 times
|